![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
And love to bag on PSA . . . here's a classic SGC card from the early days. EX/MT my eye! The back is even worse. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: anonymousdave
..with never did. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Personally, I like both services. However I'm not too fond of one their presidents. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
The SGC 98 Alcott N172 is a prime example. The back is completely tobacco stained and I doubt it could get an SGC 60 today. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
Jay, is there a picture of the Alcott available to see? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
A scan of the front used to be available on the BMW web site. The front looks great. It is the back that is stained and I have never seen a scan of that posted. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
I think this is it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tony Conte
Vargha, |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
the back looks better than the front because it is borderless. Of course, the top edge of the front is borderless too |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
the PSA 6 SF Hess in REA had a nice tobacco stain on the front. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
How did you know we were thinking that !?!?! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
But that's "Vargha-Kreskin". You left out both the "h" and the hyphen. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: WP
How long would this thread be if all of the psa problems were posted? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
This is an SGC-bashing thread - please, let's stay on the thread topic!!!!! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
It would probably be longer for two reasons: |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
You, too miss the point. I like SGC. I have submitted to them in the past and will do so in the future. I just don't attach godlike status to any organization that is run by humans. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
"projection". |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
But since I didn't mention any names and you feel so compelled to answer, consider yourself already identified. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: WP
So David what do you think of Joe "PSAPRES" Orlando? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
I've said it before. IMO, Joe Orlando is an empty suit. He has obfuscated the truth on several issues with PSA; most notably WIWAG, the Rose Rookie and Dan's card. I think that he is bad for PSA and card collecting. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john/z28jd
Heres a new form of a psa mistake,i personally have nothing against them but i didnt want to start a new thread for this card.This is their version of correcting a spelling problem that never happened.It appears that the makers of the t206s wanted to spell Pryor McElveen's name wrong but they didnt.PSA knew that and labeled this card as such |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
David - why not try starting a thread to generate some positive discussion about vintage baseball? It's obvious that you are really into witty rebuttals, but we're here to discuss vintage baseball. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BCD
believe me-if you talked to David on the phone for an hour you would enjoy the guy here after and think well of him.It seems this is the case with a lot of people none of us have met face to face. He is really a good guy! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MW
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BCD
Mikey! is that you??? Can I post this on the CU chat board under the handle "carbohydrate man" ??? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
The Baseball Card HOF came in at 53% good 47% evil. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BCD
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Crandell
I think SGC cards need to be looked at in two categories--Joe Merkel and prior and Derek and post Derek. I had some old SBC and SGC cards that were auction-house material and every company I approached(Lelands, Mile High, and others) said I would need to have them regraded by SGC. Some achieved their old grades, some did not, one was not deemed gradable. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right or Wrong | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-28-2008 07:32 PM |
SGC sent to the wrong house! John McDermott...are you here? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-02-2007 09:41 PM |
Is this the Wrong SGC Label for this Famous and Barr? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-05-2007 04:43 PM |
is something wrong here | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-01-2004 02:43 PM |
Perhaps I was wrong after all... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-08-2002 12:44 AM |