![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think if you would be a leader and quit posting rebuttals then the whole thing would die. But as long as someone needs to get the last word just to get the last word, this will be a 10-page thread full of nothing. Just let it go.
__________________
Seeking Type 1 photos especially Ruth I still love the hobby |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Its a b/s/t thread, theres really no reason for anyone to post anything for me to have to post a rebuttal. I got a guy, Greg that claims he is emailing me for many months with no response. He earlier would send many harassing pms until i posted them on here. I think you can understand i wanted to make it clear to him that i will post any emails he sends (he is free to post them here too). I have sent him ZERO/emails pms since i started that thread he is referring too. I also have not said anything negative about him on this board since that thread. I also had an issue with Dean who said i was below board basically on a card we both wanted. However when the facts were made to light, even he can agree i did nothing wrong. He agreed he should of of just pmed me and we could could of resolved it privately. However when something is made public, it had to be addressed as i make many card transactions with people here. If he was confused with me putting 'ill take it' after i bought the card, people could be equally confused that he ever offered asking price by putting 'pm sent' (even though i already had a deal before ever seeing that post as the seller and i communicated off of net54) There should be no reason for anyone else to post anything negative on this thread from this point on Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 09-12-2016 at 08:19 AM. |
#103
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok first off my aplogies to everyone for doing what I said I wouldn't do. BUT, I think in all fairness to me it needs to be said because it's unfair for Jake to say he did nothing wrong.
Jake - What you did wrong was post "I'll take it" 30 minutes after you already purchased the card. That's what caused confusion on my part. I'm in no way suggesting you didn't contact the seller first. I believe you did, however if you would have stayed silent and let the seller tell me the card had already sold I would have happily moved along. Again, my aplogies to the board for continuing this horror show. Just wanted to add. Jake, I have no beef with you. It was a case of miscommunication. I hope we can burry this and move on. Last edited by DeanH3; 09-11-2016 at 11:56 PM. |
#104
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You can always ask me to lock a thread and re-post the card in a new one. It will probably have fewer posts, at least at first.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
go back and start through the Red Cobb with Cobb back thread. This one has a long way to go to reach that one.
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't know that one. Or do you mean the Cobb/Lenox thread?
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's it - sorry, Cobb/Lennox
You win Mr. Technical ![]() |
#108
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, I remember that one. I participated in that thread. And this will end my participation in this thread.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | Cmount76 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 17 | 07-28-2016 04:20 PM |
1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson gone | ezez420 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-27-2015 07:15 AM |
FS: 1948 Leaf #79 Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2013 03:27 PM |
WTB 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-08-2013 10:35 PM |
1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 4 | incugator | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-12-2009 02:31 PM |