![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!! I wasn't my intention to entertain anyone. But I'm sorry I freaked out over it, and posted on here to get thoughts and ideas as to what it was.
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think there was a story arc in Peanuts, where Pigpen spends his Halloween trick or treating with his best friend, Detritus Mays. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peanuts was a great strip.
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great thread! I've heard the word detritus in the past but I don't think I ever took the time to look it up. I learned something today.
__________________
⚾️ Successful transactions with: npa589, OhioCardCollector, BaseballChuck, J56baseball, Ben Yourg, helfrich91, oldjudge, tlwise12, inceptus, gfgcom, rhodeskenm, Moonlight Graham |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After further examination Bobby, I don't think that is undesirable detritus... it looks like the infamous Mays swoosh autograph. You may actually now have a signed Mays Red Man!
__________________
Thanks for your thoughts, Joe. Love the late 1800’s Boston Beaneaters and the early Boston Red Sox (1903-1918)! Also collecting any and all basketball memorabilia. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One of my coworkers actually signs her name like that. Crazy, I know.
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First thing that jumped out at me, other than the shadow play, was the absolutely straight ends of the black interloper. That is something that would never occur in the natural marker-using world...unless, perhaps, some highly skilled medieval scribe (with proper pen nib attachments) was recently employed by SGC??
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm thinking it's more like swarf rather than detritus, but that's just me.
![]()
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Did you even loupe it before concluding it was marker?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Edited to add - it looks like foreign material from the black insert that is lodged in with the card. Magic marker? probably not.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. Last edited by Fred; 01-24-2023 at 08:12 PM. |
#61
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting and amusing thread. Being an IT guy, with my logical outlook, I keep wondering why anyone would think the SGC graders would be armed with a sharpie in the first place. I'll bet a T206 Hal Chase there isn't a marker anywhere inside any of the grading rooms, and therefore it's impossible that black streak isn't detritus.
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Red Man Willie without the rubber worm sure looks better than a 3 to me. The offending plastic must have happened. during encapsulation, I am guessing.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is what I am wondering how is detritus or whatever it's called any better. As tight as it those slabs are encased it is bound to leave some kind of mark which will also bring down the grade. Either way SGC screwed up what appears to be an awesome card. I would be angry.
__________________
Collect Vikings, Twins, Vintage HOF and also Off-Center vintage. ***A journey of a 1,000 miles begins with a single card! -Cardfusious Mostly PC with some for trade page: [https://www.flickr.com/photos/187700522@N03/ Recent positve trades with: Brian Van Horn, frank bmd, nkesterke09, ajg, esehombre, mrmantlecollector, KC Doughboy, gregr2,bn2cardz, sycks22 |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That’s actually a very reasonable line of thinking, and this example below is a different company…but did this BGS grader evaluate the card and then run to the secured sharpie room to draw his Xs and the outline of the trimmed areas from memory? There are probably more dangers in the grading rooms than we know. I don’t know for sure what the issue is on the OP’s card, but the SGC scan makes it look a little different than the scan on this thread. Eagerly awaiting the final determination. ![]()
__________________
. || || \/ If you want a deal, you might not get a card. If you want a card, you might not get a deal. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am amused that the OP is getting more flack for confusing a marker mark and detritus than SGC is for screwing up another card. At least it’s not somebody’s pube this time? The standards people have for SGC are incredibly low or nonexistent.
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Someone will try and pass it off as a late stage Mays signed Red Man.
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No offense but if anyone thinks that it's a sharpie mark you need a new monitor or phone or whatever device you're looking at the image with.
When Bobby first posted the thread I thought he was joking about the sharpie mark. |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pat....I'll be the first to admit. My eyes are shit. I'm not 40 anymore. When my eyes turned to shit, it literally happened overnight. One day I had perfect vision. The next day, things were blurry. And yes, when I looked at the card via the image they provided, it looked like a marker. Especially where it got light in the middle. Only when I looked at it with the loupe in really bright light did it appear to be "something foreign". What it is, I have no idea. It is not a pubic hair. Someone else suggested a shaving from the black gasket?? I have no idea.
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This. I don't think I am really getting flack though. We are having a discussion. I asked for help. I am getting it. I am just amazed at things that go thru as OK. I've have seen BOTH companies I use do it. I half jokingly volunteered to be their Quality Control guy. I think I would be perfect at it. I know what collectors would be happy with, and I know what would piss them off. As an added bonus, I like the weather in Florida.
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Apparently, it already has.
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like it has to me as well.....
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitely not a marker. Actually looks like a thin piece of black wire.
Last edited by SyrNy1960; 01-25-2023 at 06:13 AM. |
#74
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct.....My original thought has been corrected. It is a foreign object. Hopefully it hasn't damaged the card.
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 01-25-2023 at 06:12 AM. |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1,000
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
That's a sharp looking card! ![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#77
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What's the point in bashing the TPG'ers anymore???? They all screw up...routinely. Some more than others...but they ALL make mistakes.
They are a necessary evil in the hobby...which we have to live with. |
#78
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct. All they can do is strive to be better. It just seems like some of this stuff could be avoidable. I guess when they are churning out as many cards as they are, it's just one gigantic blur.
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have so little...don't take this away from us!
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#80
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
bitch away then! I like to complain sometimes too!!!
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Told dad when I saw him a few weeks later, and pretty much the same read the paper fine one day, next day couldn't find a good place to hold it where he could see clearly. |
#82
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It has made a huge difference in my collecting habits. I loved the cards with several variations like the 89 Fleer Bill Ripken and Randy Johnson cards. Now that my vision isn't as good I just don't have the passion for them that I used to have. |
#84
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#86
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This happened before Christmas, and yes - I was royally pissed. Total lack of QC, someone should have seen that on the scan if not in hand if any QC had been done at all. I emailed Brent at SGC in a tizzy and told him to refund me (which he did) because I was popping the card. I spent the next few days being pissy on social media and generally disavowing everything about TPG's. (The fact that they also sent me back a '54 Jackie as trimmed did nothing to improve my mood). What's the moral here? I really don't know. At the end of the day, though I am increasingly more into raw lower grade vintage - there are a few cards like that Mantle that I want in a slab. SGC despite their all too human faults - still does this kind of thing less often and has better customer service in general than PSA does. So yeah, I'm trying to be more patient and forgiving here in the new year - and obviously, I'm eating my words right now on my pubed up, Peter Griffin-worthy '63 Mantle. Sorry to the OP that this happened to you on what looks like an otherwise very nice Red Man Mays. To me, that looks like what I see even more often floating around in SGC slabs - it's like a piece of the molding that is used in the inserts? That is hands down the hugest one I've ever seen that got encapsulated and somehow made it past them, if that is what it is. Sad yes, and no excuse. But they are human. And I'm trying to look at things like my own patience, etc. a bit different here in the new year. I have no idea how long it will last, but I'm hopeful... And PS - yeah, you can bang on and rattle SGC slabs all day long if there is something sealed up in there you don't like. It doesn't work. I've never been able to get lint or the black insert shards that you sometimes see to move even a fraction by doing that. The only alternatives seem to be to pop the slab or send back to them for a re-holder.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 01-25-2023 at 09:16 AM. |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
_ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme, seablaster, twalk, qed2190, Gorditadogg, LuckyLarry, tlhss, Cory |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is the only business type I’ve encountered where people have truly 0 expectations and get an instant free pass no matter what. It’s strange. |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was certainly not giving him flack just joking around. As far as TPG errors and indiscretions, etc etc, this one by SGC does not even make the top 100 list.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#90
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well....at least the Red Man card is right side up, if that's what you mean.
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Have you contacted SGC yet Bobby? |
#92
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes...unfortunately. Each month that passes I grade fewer and fewer cards.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
__________________
_ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme, seablaster, twalk, qed2190, Gorditadogg, LuckyLarry, tlhss, Cory |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You must play the game by "their" rules. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So . . . . . on the subject of detritus in the slab . . .
Maybe 3 years ago I bid on the card below. I could tell from the auction house picture that there was something on the slab, either a stray hair or maybe a scratch on the case. Worst case, I figured, was detritus in the slab, and I thought in that event I could then send the card in for re-holdering. The card got a clean grade from PSA (as you can see) so I wasn't worried the card was actually defaced. Well, I won the card, and when it arrived it was not detritus, but pencil scribbles on the card. (It loops around the K in MICKEY and down through the f in outfield.) I contacted PSA, sent them pictures of the scribbles and then sent the actual card in for review. Amazingly enough, they confirmed the unqualified grade. Their reasoning was that it was "the grader's judgement" whether to qualify the card. I pushed back, saying their written policy required a qualified grade in the event a card is marked, it is not a judgement call. Their written response, which the customer service rep said came from their "head grader" was that the pencil scribbles were "not in the nature of a mark" and that even if they were, were "not significant enough to warrant a qualified grade". I called the CS rep to make sure I understood what she was saying and she told me she had gotten that specific language from Reza for her response. These are the facts and only the facts. I leave it up to you to decide what is and is not a mark, because I cannot make sense of it. |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The worst thing that has ever happened to me personally with a slab probably was a '55 Topps Jackie Robinson in a BVG slab. There was a hunk of wood, almost like a splinter - sealed up inside the inner bag on top of the card. I cracked it almost immediately. Miraculously the wood detritus just slid right off, and the card inside - though not high grade to begin with - was no worse for the wear.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#98
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To be fully transparent, I'm part of the problem. I stand for it. I signed up to be slapped in the face one more time when I mailed SGC cards yet again a few days ago. Guess we'll see what happens.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unbelievable! | rdwyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-27-2015 09:18 AM |
Unbelievable Scam | Rollingstone206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-31-2014 09:38 AM |
Unbelievable! | jthorst75 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 04-02-2012 06:21 PM |
To me...this is unbelievable! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-01-2009 06:20 AM |
This is an unbelievable amount of coin for this card! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 07-15-2005 02:12 PM |