![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not always true. As far as I can tell, there's nothing wrong with the bottom of this one:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 12-29-2013 at 06:13 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Maybe Ted Z or Jim Rivera or Tim Cathey the T206 experts could chime in here but I don't think what you are showing can happen in the factory with what we know of the cutting process? dan Last edited by danmckee; 03-22-2012 at 12:19 PM. Reason: . to ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
6000+ views and rocking!
This is a kick-ass thread! I see what Bill told me with the Cobb Bat off, that card looks good from the scan and looks like it would have warranted a numerical grade. Very interesting, has anyone looked at the other Authentics? How many look good? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As long as we are at it, comments on this one?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my opinion, top and bottom are hacked. But I welcome other opinions and I think we need the larger raw scan so that the holder insert doesn't deceive us at the corners.
John Wonka can you add the raw Magie for us? Thank you Last edited by danmckee; 03-22-2012 at 12:40 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess we must remember as Bruce stated, SGC has had these in their hands and we haven't. Working off of scans is much different than in person. They are nice expensive cards and will be treasured by whoever purchases them.
Last edited by danmckee; 03-22-2012 at 12:46 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So, I am not going to out a current auction, but there is this card that is currently up for auction, it is a T206 Cobb Green portrait, and this is the back. The flip says PSA5 Ex, how in the heck can the back damage on this card warrant an Ex!!!!!
![]() ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have discussed this one I think. I think this one is just as mind boggling. Paperloss and glue. If it is a legit flip, it almost looks like they only looked at the front? I guess if you are rushed, it could happen.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are we missing something here?? Why are these not in psa holders? I would think the PSA registry would command more money than the SGC holder on these huge nice cards no?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that psa 5 cobb has been on ebay for months....that's one that psa missed badly, or the card was swapped out. hard to believe psa would miss that.
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 03-22-2012 at 01:13 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do we know whether these cards were submitted to PSA first and rejected, and if so is there any way to find out...
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have one point to make in this huge debate. You state above that you don't think what is showing can happen in the factory with what we know of the cutting process. The big point is that you are only drawing assumptions about the cut and not known facts. We have never had access to the factory that actually separated these cards, so how can we ever be sure about Plank, Cobb and Magie? Not trying to stir the pot, just thought I'd ask ![]() mike.ca.ve
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to hear opinions about the sgc 84 joe doyle...that's the one i have a genuine interest in.
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 03-22-2012 at 01:28 PM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hi Mike and thanks for posting. Yes you are correct, I don't know any of this for certain. I do know that handling tobacco cards for years and buying many raw collections that a legit angle cut has always had the opposite angle cut on the other border. That is why I was hoping Jim R or Tim C or Ted Z could comment on what they know of the cutting practice. I may be mistaking but I thought 1 or all of them did some research on that part. Tim C maybe? thanks again for the interesting comments dan |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Marty Last edited by martyp; 03-23-2012 at 02:01 AM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"It's amazing how much better these old cards look without any plastic in the way." Sounds to me like Scott has his eyes open, looking at cards, instead of looking at slip numbers. A few years ago I started saving those little slips. Maybe one day some collectors will zero in on the slips, and forgo the cards that some of us collect.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dan: I don't know about the Cobb; I haven't seen it in person. I am not comfortable definitively opining on a card from a scan in a slab.
Chris: by "crap" I meant from a quality control standpoint, my point in context being that we've all seen T206s that were so badly miscut or misprinted that they can only be viewed as failures of quality control, and if those got out why is it impossible to conceive of a properly printed P150 Plank getting out. As for a non-parallel cut, it could happen if the sheet slipped in the cutter, depending on the cutting device used. I have a number of Topps cards that are not quite parallelograms in shape.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 03-23-2012 at 07:56 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 12-29-2013 at 06:14 PM. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Steve B |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm not weighing in on whether the Magie, Plank or Cobb are trimmed, although I do have an opinion, but rather just pointing out that not all diamond/diagonal cuts which don't have a matching opposite border, are hand cut or altered. I might mention I have also seen (and once owned) a very nice orange background Tinker E98 which had a wicked diamond cut left border and a straight right border and it sailed through grading with an SGC 40grade as SGC recognized it was a factory miscut. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bringing this one back from the past.
![]()
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 03-22-2012 at 11:31 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Chris, I didn't realize that it had been roughed up in order to get the numerical grade. That's something that would not have happened prior to the birth of slabbing
![]() I just took the Speaker out and looped the borders very carefully - no problems at all. It's amazing how much better these old cards look without any plastic in the way.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh the factory cut Hunt Plank (roll eyes)...to slab PSA 3 to Ebay to profit land...
![]() Last edited by wonkaticket; 03-23-2012 at 12:32 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where have all the T206 uncut sheets gone.... ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 01-21-2012 11:10 AM |
My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 11:43 AM |
t206 Plank and Magie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-25-2006 12:33 PM |
t206 Plank and Magie on ebay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-15-2003 03:43 PM |
Magie Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-17-2002 01:47 PM |