Which One Is The Keeper? (Signed T206 Wheat)

[chaddurbin]

2nd. if ur an auto collector then the 1st sig sucks.

[GrayGhost]

For me, the second one, due to two sigs and stronger. But, if card condition is critical, choose number one, In fact, they r both GREAT. ha

[tothrk]

Keep the second sig. You should probably give the first one to a fine, upstanding citizen who would appreciate it.

[3-2-count]

Boy this is a tough choice, but knowing your interest is mainly sig's you have to go with #2. Much bolder and signed twice.....

[Howe’s Hunter]

Number two is a nicer example of the signature, and while that card has issues, the color is nicer and the front sig is much better. #2.

[Cardboard Junkie]

A sig/autograph is the "kiss of death" for me. Might as well have a card with a hole in it or paper loss. If you like autos collect them searate on a ball or indexcard or what ever, to place ink on a card detroys it . But to me an autographed card is ruined. Just MHO. dave

[atx840]

I do love me some beaters. I would go with the second as it has character, strong double signature & more detailed colour.

Both very nice cards!

[Rickyy]

I guess it depends on what's more important to you...in this case the autograph on the card vs the card with the autograph...then I'd keep the 2nd one with a much nicer signature.

Ricky Y

[David W]

Article by Morey on autograph collecting from (I think) The Trader Speaks
in the late 60's.

[fkm_bky]

Which one do you keep? The answer is yes. Both are great, but if I had to pick one, I like the first one better from the clarity of the sig and overall eye appeal.

Bill