![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why not just stamp them "reprint" and avoid all the contention? I think you wouldn't have so much venom spit at you if you just did that. What would be the harm in an embossed stamp on the back that says what it is? Those in the hobby are the only police in the hobby, so you have to see why some are so concerned. You must realize by doing this you create a problem that doesn't need to be. Topps issues reprints all the time and no one here bats an eyelash. That's because they are clearly marked as reprints and it's all done above board. I think it's the deceptive way this process is done that makes it so offensive to most on this site. Just some insights, take them or leave them. Yes this is America, you have every right to do what you do, but it doesn't make it moral.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 reprints | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 01-20-2010 03:46 PM |
EBAY has lost touch with what made them great... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-28-2008 09:30 PM |
Boston Globe article - ranking Sox managers - card pics - Fan Craze, T205's, D304, etc. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-24-2008 07:43 AM |
What made this National great for you ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 08-15-2007 10:50 PM |
Obak reprints? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-22-2005 10:03 PM |