![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am of the opinion that there are actually 3 variations to this set.
The instructions version has what I call "hands up" and "hands down" variations. While I expect that some of you will disagree with me on this "extra" variation, I'm confident that if any of you found a card where the back was printed both "right-side-up" and "up-side-down" you would call it a variation. From my experience, I believe that the ratio of backs is approximately : Hands Down - 60% Hands Up - 30% Blank - 10% Here's a picture, so you'll see what I'm talking about, hands down, blank, hands up. Doug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1960 Baseball Hi-Lites blank backs | Bob Lemke | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 01-25-2010 07:28 PM |
1963 peel off blank backs 10x rarer than instuctions | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 02-17-2008 09:45 PM |
Let's see how many issues can be found with blank backs (that aren't supposed to). | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-07-2006 08:18 PM |
E210 W502 Tharp's Sweetham...Blank backs???? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-19-2006 11:01 AM |
1928 George Ruth Candy blank backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-18-2005 04:40 PM |