 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
02-24-2010, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Since this is a vintage baseball card chatboard, and most of the people posting here have a much greater appreciation for cards than for game used bats, let me pose a hypothetical question:
Suppose Upper Deck bought a T206 Wagner at auction, cut it into fifty pieces, and inserted each one of those tiny cardboard squares randomly into packs. Maybe some lucky collector would end up with the eyes, or some of the orange background, or the "WAG" of his name. Would anybody who supported the notion that it was okay to destroy the bat feel differently about decimating the holy grail? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any interest? 1990s Angels media guides ... cheap! other teams available | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 02-02-2008 05:41 PM |
| Any interest in 1972 Classic Cards? | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 10-09-2007 04:24 PM |
| Auction House Conflict of Interest | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 09-11-2007 07:16 AM |
| Way OT but probably of interest to Board | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-08-2005 11:38 AM |
| Mastro conflict of interest policy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-10-2005 01:59 PM |
Threaded Mode