 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
08-18-2009, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly. Even with full disclosure of any work done to a baseball, many collectors turn away from such items due to the correct perception that they are marred and no longer in original condition. I'm sure that Dick has no malicious intent on his end, but this service will be used by people with deceit in their hearts and dollar signs in their minds.
I would be interested to see examples of your latest work, Dick, although it would be much better to see in-person. Just remember--things like this do not get past a VSC. I would also assume that, when held to a light at a certain angle, ballpoint pen impressions where ink was removed are still entirely visible. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 08-18-2009 at 11:22 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Companion Pieces - ink blotters and E94 envelope | rman444 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-25-2009 09:09 AM |
| question on diamond star back ink | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-26-2008 11:25 PM |
| Autographed HOF baseballs FS each with HOF Year Inscribed | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 09-21-2007 07:42 PM |
| Ink Bleed on Back of '33 Goudey? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-11-2007 06:19 PM |
| Possibly unique E94 missing ink error-Taking Offers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 05-07-2006 05:09 PM |
Threaded Mode