 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
02-29-2008, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Crandell's personal thread
Posted By: CoreyRS.hanus
Why is it easier to cover up an alteration to a low grade card than to a high grade card? Other than perhaps soaking, which probably in and of itself is not sufficient to upgrade a card to high grade, why would the typical alteration methods (e.g., trimming, rebuilt corners, added coloring) be more difficult to detect with a vg-ex card than with a nr mt/mt card? I don't understand that. Assuming the grading company is equally diligent looking for such things with low grade cards as they are with high grade cards, why should more things slip through with the low grade cards? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Personal Thanks to Barry Sloate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-09-2007 08:51 PM |
| Personal Checks for Sale | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 04-09-2006 10:37 PM |
| personal web sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-23-2005 03:20 PM |
| Personal Pictures | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-27-2004 12:26 PM |
| Personal Checks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-16-2004 12:28 PM |
Threaded Mode