Plank card

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

Nice to see that you had no defense for what I pointed other than calling me a putz. Maybe Leon needs put you on a short leash as you always seem to be in the middle of trouble around here.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

Leon, apology accepted.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Scott L

It's gotten to the point where the poor guy is apologizing for posting on a baseball card messageboard that he found some baseball cards ......incredible.

[Archive]

Posted By: leon

I hear ya....and that is why I stepped in..

[Archive]

Posted By: Scott L

Leon
You must have the patience of 10,000 men. Hats off to you.

Scott

[Archive]

Posted By: Bob Pomilla

Well, Sky, just think of this as a toughening-up course, which will serve you well should you ever do decide to test the card market. Congrats on a great find.

[Archive]

Posted By: E, Daniel

Actually Jay, unlike yourself, English is probably my strong suit.

His question actually betrays you for the lack of hobby understanding you've revealed. It is a question every hobbyist has discussed on this board a million times:

Just who was the manufacturer/printer/maker of these Cobb/Cobb cards. It's a sophisticated and intuitive question which he arrived at after looking at his other T cards.
It's everything you're not.

Question answered, and In deferrence to Leon's very reasonable request, and everyone else no doubt being annoyed that such an enjoyable discovery could be so derailed, I'll shut up from here on out on this thread.


Sincerely
Daniel

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

Too bad I'm not a betting man because even though he has some incredible cards, I doubt he has 3 Cobb/Cobb cards. He might have 3 t206 red background Cobbs, but I doubt they have Cobb backs. Hopefully he will step in and clear things up.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Frank Wakefield

Skydash,

Please email me.

Thanks.

Frank fwakefield1@comcast.net

[Archive]

Posted By: Dave F

Well, skydash mentioned havint three Cobbs. I took that to mean three Cobbs period..not T206's with Cobb backs. It appears he has some E90's, E92's, T205's and T206's....he could have any of the Cobbs....but I doubt a T206 Cobb back

[Archive]

Posted By: Randy Trierweiler

Skydash, don't worry at all about your posts being the cause of the fighting you see here. These guys have gone at it this way long before you came here. It may look bad to a newcomer, but these spats are not unusual at all.

Your find is very close to a historic level, and the testoserone level is higher than normal.

Congrats on your good fortune.

95% of the posts here are from good folks who wish you well.

Good luck.

[Archive]

Posted By: skydash55

Well, skydash mentioned havint three Cobbs. I took that to mean three Cobbs period..not T206's with Cobb backs. It appears he has some E90's, E92's, T205's and T206's....he could have any of the Cobbs....but I doubt a T206 Cobb back

I have found 6. One of which I'll show you here along with 2 other random cards..

http://s183.photobucket.com/albums/x291/skydash55/

[Archive]

Posted By: Eric

That's a very good looking T206 Red Background Cobb. Looks to be in excellent shape!

[Archive]

Posted By: Dave F

What back is on that Red Cobb portrait Skydash? Piedmont? Sweet Caporal? Polar Bear?

[Archive]

Posted By: skydash55

What back is on that Red Cobb portrait Skydash? Piedmont? Sweet Caporal? Polar Bear?
Piedmont

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

I'm guessing I won't be getting an apology from the esteemed E Daniel.

Sky, don't worry about the craziness that swirls around me. I'm basically the Barry Bonds of net54. You either love me or hate me, with most hating me and no matter what I do or say, I am always wrong. So don't sweat it.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Brian

Sky -- not your fault at all. A thread about "Oxygen is good" would degenerate to a pissing contest here.

[Archive]

Posted By: DMcD

I like oxygen.

[Archive]

Posted By: Dave F

I don't like oxygen David. And can't believe you'd imply you do on here.

[Archive]

Posted By: peter ullman

sky...that cobb is sweet...nice big, white borders. I can't wait to see more of those cobbies! And don't fret the bickering...I'd be more concerned if it wasn't occurring.

pete in mn

[Archive]

Posted By: T206Collector

...sucks!

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

" If you don't have anything constructive or positive to add to this or his others posts, please don't post then."

Jay you should listen to your own advice.

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

I'm not the one that made the stupid post or got upset for being called out about it. You should be directing you energy to E Daniel instead and take a look at yourself for making a post you know will inflame things. It never fails that when I post, you 2 come after me

Just more proof that people try to blame me for everything.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

All Daniel did was try to add a little humor to the thread. You may not have found it funny but there was no reason to call him an idiot. You reap what you sow.

[Archive]

Posted By: Jerry

Skydash, you have a great collection of cards there. From what I have seen so far you have some cards that are seldom seen in the hobby. The Colgan's Thorpe was a complete rumor until somebody posted a picture of one just the other day. Yours is only the second one I have seen in 20yrs in the hobby and the first one was 2 days ago, what a coincidence. The Colgan's Jackson is a super rare card and very seldom encountered. As a matter of fact the Tin Tops Colgan's are much scarcer as a whole than regular Stars of the Diamond Colgan's. All this talk about T206 Planks & Cobb with Cobb backs are just people fantasizing about your collection. You could have some other rare cards but the odds of you having those particular cards are probally non exisistant. I would much enjoy looking at somemore of your cards.
If you ever decide to sell any of them, be sure and talk to Barry Sloate or Rob Lifson. With the scope of your collection, don't settled for less than 0% sellers commission.

[Archive]

Posted By: Randy Trierweiler

"Just more proof that people try to blame me for everything."

Jay, your right. You do get blamed for everything. Your just a victim. Your always the victim.

I can't believe that somebody who does absolutely nothing wrong and never says anything wrong, gets blamed so much.

I don't know how you put up with all this abuse.

If I were you, I'd leave and never come back.

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

Leon asked this to stop and be taken to email if you guys feel the need to vent. Obviously, you have no respect for Leon's wishes.

I will say this and stop answering you guys, I never said I was blameless. The point is that no matter what the situation is, whether I deserve to be blamed or not, I will get blamed for it. I'm an easy scapegoat, just like Bonds, because I am disliked, but don't blame for pissing matches, etc when it people like you, E Daniel and Pete keep piling on and throwing fuel on the fire. It takes two to tango and you guys are just as guilty of causeing problems around here I am.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

Just to clear something up. Barry Bonds is not a scapegoat or innocent of anything for that matter. He made his bed, now he has to lay in it.

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

Bonds is very much a scapegoat for the whole steroid mess. If he's not a scapegoat,then why isn't there as much hate spewed towards Giambi, McGwire, Palmerio, et al? They were caught with PEDs but don't get anywhere near the hate Bonds does. People don't like Bonds, but those guys had a decent following, so it's a whole lot easier to make Bonds a scapegoat than any of those guys.

Just what was Bonds foulnd guilty of? I missed that court case.

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

All of those guys you mentioned have had plenty of their share of abuse. But, McGwire and Palmeiro are now retired. Why would people still be abusing them the same way as an active player like Bonds? Giambi admitted doing it and received a very fair share of abuse for that. However, none of these guys have the records right now that Bonds has. And that makes a difference with public perception. We had this talk about Bonds a couple days ago and you asked if I ever watched him play early in his career? I'm a Pirates fan, so yes I did. My cousin played for the Pirates in 1986 with Bonds and all throughout the minors and told me plenty of stories of what a jack-hole the guy is. In fact, I'm sure I know more about Bonds than the average fan. I still maintain Bonds was/is a joke when it comes to defense in the outfield. Laughable or not, that is my opinion as well as many others.

[Archive]

Posted By: Justin

Why aren't Derek Turnbow and Guillermo Mota being criticized when both actually failed drug tests for roids?

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

or how about Nefi Perez, he just got strike 3

Jay

The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least.

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

I answered both of those questions in my post above your posts. Fair or not, it is because Bonds broke the biggest records. If McGwire still had the single season HR record he would receive much more abuse for it today. I didn't say I agree with singling out just Bonds for steroids. But, I also didn't say he was innocent. There are many players just as guilty. If that makes him technically a scapegoat, then fine.

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

I think of Bonds more as a symbol and lightning rod for the steroid generation than a scapegoat. But Jay has one valid point, how do you throw out an entire generation of baseball players? There just isn't a good answer.

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

"I still maintain Bonds was/is a joke when it comes to defense in the outfield. Laughable or not, that is my opinion as well as many others."

Didn't he win 8 Gold Gloves? Yeah I know they don't always get the award right, I know all about Palmeiro, but he couldn't have won EIGHT being a joke, could he??

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

I don't care what the man says - or any other baseball executive - Bud Selig and everybody throughout the game KNEW about the steroid use being prevalent. After the 1994 strike, MLB needed a 'pick-me-up' and steroids provided that. The fans came back for the homerun. EVEN MLB ran advertisements.."Chicks dig the longball". I think that was really when it started to get out of control. It has even been rumored that steroids were being used in the mid to late 1980's by only a few players.

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

I think the steroid rumors about Canseco went back to the 80s. It was not too long after Ben Johnson was stipped of his medal, was it 88? The Fenway fans used to chant "Steroids steroids" and Jose would make muscles, it was great theater.

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

Rafael Palmeiro won a gold glove at 1b despite playing only 28 games there one year. MLB rarely gets the award right. I don't think you can just go on how many a player gets. Sadly, if a player can hit a ton, he will win the gold glove award - unless of course another player at that same position hit better. Sometimes the correct players wins it.

[Archive]

Posted By: PAS

I am interested in why you say Bonds was a joke as a left fielder. I can't say I have seen him enough to form a strong opinion, although the games I saw seemed consistent with his reputation as a very strong outfielder.

[Archive]

Posted By: Marc

The reason I say that is because he has - in my opinion - the weakest arm I've seen in MLB. And I can remember how the Pirates couldn't figure out where to play the guy because he wasn't that great of an outfielder. They tried him in CF and he didn't perform well. His arm was too weak for RF. Finally, Leyland decided on LF. If anyone remembers, it also wasn't until Leyland switched Bonds from leadoff to #5 in the order that his career took off. In fact, the Pirates almost traded Bonds to Atlanta for - I want to think Gerald Perry or Andres Thomas - because they didn't think he was going to amount to much. That was between 1988 and 1989. Between his struggles in the outfield, his bad attitude, and what the Pirates thought was 'lack of desire' to perform at his potential, he almost got traded away. Who knows what would have happened after that?

[Archive]

Posted By: Bill K@sel

Would you three children please take this to another thread!!?? I don't open Skydash's topics to listen to the three of you pontificate on Bonds and steroids or call each other names. Way to hi-jack a VERY exciting and interesting thread. (keeping mouth shut per Leon's wishes from going any further)

Skydash - I just wanted to say congratulations on your "find". It's been great to read about how it came about and the unbelievable cards you have alread uncovered. Listen to what the "normal" people on this board are telling you regarding legal tax advice, protecting, insuring, grading, and if you decide to, selling off some or all of the collection.

You have a great attitude. Don't let the infighting and bickering keep you from informing us how everything progresses.

Let's get this back on track or lock it down.

Bill

My personal collection - http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f176/fkm_bky/

[Archive]

Posted By: MVSNYC

Bill- i was just about to say the same thing...

GOD DAMMIT guys, take it offline, i am sick of reading your ****!

now i'm pist. i'm taking some time away from the board, this is ridiculous!

SKY- congrats, and best of luck. IMO, call Rob Lifson at REA, he will take very good care of you & your collection.

Best-
Michael Sarno

[Archive]

Posted By: Rob Dewolf

Bill,

Thanks for posting what I'm sure many of us were thinking.

Sky,

I'll echo the congratulations that many others have posted and add that you've seen the best and worst of this board. There are many folks who are more than willing to share their vast knowledge of the hobby, and there seem to be a few who consistently need the attention to be on them. My only advice is to focus on the former rather than the latter.

Good luck,

Rob

[Archive]

Posted By: JK

Ditto here - who really cares about Bonds. And if you do, this thread isn't the place.

Sky - great find. Congrats. Please show more pics if you are comfortable doing so.

[Archive]

Posted By: Brian

Sky,

I apologize to you for the pissing match tangents that this thread is suffering. Its sad this board isn't mature enough to handle a "find" of 1,200+ cards, of which several are extremely significant....

Brian

[Archive]

Posted By: Jeff Mohler

Congratulations on a great find! I sure hope to see the Thorpe on the auction block! I am sure all of us collectors (and dealers too) on the board dream of having this happen to us too

Jeff

[Archive]

Posted By: boxingbaseballgolf33

I have to say it was fun on the first day, after that the posts were getting out of hand. Good Luck with your collection Skydash55, we are always here to help

Jimmy

[Archive]

Posted By: Rob

Skydash, congrats! I wonder if you were to get the cards graded by SGC, if they'd tag them with "Skydash find" like they did with Lionel Carters and Nagy collections?

Have you decided if you're going to keep any/all of them as family heirlooms (sp?) ? Either way, congrats!

Rob

[Archive]

Posted By: JK

Rob,

I doubt SGC would tag those cards like they did the carter and nagy collections. Im fairly certain that SGC will only do that in very limited circumstances such as a collection from a hobby pioneer. As cool as this find is, its not quite the same thing.

[Archive]

Posted By: skydash55

Thanks for everything guys....I am simply overwhelmed.