 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
06-18-2006, 12:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
condition of cards collected
Posted By: Ray
In my own, very humble opinion...I feel the same way as Dustan and Brett. First of all, I don't have the huge bank account to support buying high grade stuff. Secondly, a pre-war card looks "wrong" to me in a 5 or 6 holder. Most look no different to me than a reprint made a few years ago and have a lot less character in my opinion. My only concern when buying pre-war is that the card is not altered, has minimal staining, minimal paper loss, and no writing on it. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ralphie Parker collected T206's... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-27-2008 10:49 AM |
| Do you think vintage players collected their own cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-04-2005 09:38 PM |
| condition rarity in e cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-02-2005 11:24 PM |
| poor condition cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-17-2005 05:24 PM |
| Something to think about in regards to a cards condition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-06-2005 01:44 PM |
Threaded Mode