![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete Z.
I picked this card up today at a local card show from a dealer who's willing to refund my money if it turns out to be a fake. As you can see it's in a PSA 3 holder without a T designation. Does anyone else think the back of the card appears too white? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott brockelman
its a real card coupon cigarettes type 2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
The interesting part is that PSA didn't indicate the card type on the label. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joan
It is way lovely! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: brian p
I think it is real, but it is way too white for my liking. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: al davis
real and trimmed at top |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
A real T213, and may well be ever so slightly trimmed all the way around. Still a nice card. Not "too white" at all. Maybe someone mixed up a very weak solution of OxyClean and gave Mr. McGraw a bath and a good rinse, before his trimming and slabbing. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
if they are a professional grading company shouldn't you be able to resubmit this card to them? they then could re-slab it at no charge and get it right this time,or determine that the slab has been tampered with? that's what i would expect from a legitimate business. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
but the card does look trimmed, esp. the bottom. This is more what the sizing should be: |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
I don't know anything about T206 or T213 cards - but I thought these cards came in roughly different sizes due to the imperfect factory machinary cutting back in the 1910s. So a card of the same player in the same set could be slightly different size without either being trimmed. Is that the case? If so, then how can anyone say they are trimmed by looking at the size of the card from a scan? I'm not debating it's not trimmed, just wondering what you guys are looking at or thinking about when you say it looks trimmed (especially if cards did come in different sizes back then). |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Evanov
"...while Mr. McGraw was an aggravation, and an attorney, he's commited not crime that justifies plastic prison." |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Is that it is fine. I have had quite a few of all of the series. The only one that is always "short"/ "thin" are the type 3's. This card looks ok...and yes cmoking is correct in that most series had a little deviation to their sizes. Type 2 coupons less than many other's though...(it's hard to see the bottom border but the corners match fairly well)..regards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
Ok, I don't remember that far back either, I graduated law school in 1987... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
the upper and lower right don't look right to me. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
I think it was something else that clinched it for you! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete Z.
at once when you guys raised the spector of trimming (the card is 1/32nd short top to bottom btw) and bleaching. I was later reassured by Leon's guess that the card is probably ok, and am looking forward to a response to similar questions about the card's condition I posed in an email to Bob Luce at SGC. If he says all bets are off re a crossover based on his review of the scans, then the card's going back. I really hope it works out 'cause the card would make a great addition as my t213 type. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Evanov
"I thought I'd read in a McGraw biography (was it by Alexander?) that both McGraw and Hughie Jennings got law degrees while coaching baseball at a college, the name of which I don't recall, but I believe it was the predecessor to St. Bonaventure. Might have been Alegheny College??" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
Leave it in the holder. SGC will not cross this card over. I disagree with my friend Leon here regarding the 1914 Coupons. I've handled hundreds of the series 2 (20 for 5 cents) cards and don't recall ever seeing a single one which had size difference the way this McGraw does. On the other hand, I agree with Leon when he says the series 3 (16 for 10 cents) 1919 cards are much smaller than series 1 and 2. They are, but the series 2 cards don't have the deviations in size of the E90-1 or M116s, rather they are pretty consistently exact. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I am not sure that SGC will cross this over if it doesn't meet size requirements. The only way I've gotten around that is to send them other cards, at the same time, from the same series so they can see the sizes side by side. I have a T215 McGraw that looks way short but I sent it in with another T215 (obviously not trimmed with well rounded corners) and both measured the same and both graded. If anyone looked at that McGraw they would say it's definitely trimmed. It's not though. Again, my guess is still that this one isn't, from the scan shown. Would be better to see it in person, obviously. good luck and let us know... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick
In the scan of the back you can see how all 4 corners show some wear...so if the card was trimmed, what was the point of it? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Maybe a kid did it, or a collector who could not store it otherwise. I bought a lower grade T card once that had obviously been oversized and trimmed on the top by someone a long time ago so it would measure the same as the other cards in the collection. Didn't Buck Barker trim down E cards to fit T sheets (not suggesting its a Barker card; merely offering an example of a non-nefarious trimming)? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Wasn't such a bad thing 30-50 years ago. I remember when Lew Lipset auctioned off the Macpherson (sp?) collection. I believe he had said that Don was always cutting cards down to fit in holders. I have heard many other stories of similar incidents by other old time collectors.....So I am sure a lot of the cards that are trimmed came from older collector's collections. It was no big deal AND they had to get them to fit into the holders/sheets somehow |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Just think: |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete Z.
It's not trimmed (you have it in hand to know this). PSA promptly responded to my email about the error in the label with a phone call yesterday to tell me that they would fix the "mechanical error" for free. Personally, I think this card looks better in a PSA holder. Thanks for your help on this matter. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on recent t206 lot | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-30-2008 06:21 PM |
Please help with recent t206 purchase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-18-2008 11:00 AM |
What do you think of my purchase? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-22-2007 09:54 PM |
Advice about recent antique store purchase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-14-2005 07:02 AM |
T205 purchase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-06-2005 10:25 PM |