 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16
03-24-2002, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Trimmed? Or something else?
Posted By: warshawlaw
I pointed out not to flag Kit Young as good or bad but to show that SGC couldn't get its story straight from month to month. Why was it bad one day but good a month later? I also think about the ramifications of these determinations. There were some real slap fights on the old Full Count board between buyers and sellers of raw cards over grading service opinions; it concerns the heck out of me that these opinions are being treated as gospel when they are anything but. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (1) Trimmed T205 and (1) Trimmed T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2008 11:54 AM |
| This sure does look trimmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-30-2007 06:34 AM |
| e93 trimmed or not trimmed? please help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-13-2006 09:23 PM |
| trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-17-2005 11:40 AM |
| This has got to be trimmed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-20-2004 02:31 PM |
Threaded Mode