![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Plastic Dog
Doug and other experts (TBob etc.), |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Doug Allen
I will defer to TBob as the expert. My experience was from putting together my personal set. I would list the following ranking: |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill Cornell
Lipset's book has the T205's in this level of difficulty (descending): |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Hodes
I have a set (minus a variation or 2) that I have been upgrading and my take is that the Hobby (no stats) is much more difficult than the others (it's a 4 figure card in any shape). I don't know what the population is but few and far between would certainly be conservative. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
Everyone can see Lipset's difficulty gradients for the T205s and check out their SCDs, but I think there are some hidden tough as nails cards out there in this set. Everyone knows how impossible the Hoblitzell no stats is, the dynamic duo of Graham and Shean Cubs, Collins mouth open, etc., I wanted to find some hidden toughies. I hesitate to spring my gleaned knowledge on the board because I know I'll be bidding against you guys in the future on these suckers, but here goes: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Plastic Dog
TBob, I promise I won't bid against you for these cards. As far as you know. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Maybe I just got really lucky when I put together my 205s. the only card I had real trouble getting was the Joss. A lot of the cards you guys are listing as toughies were among some of the first ones I owned when I started the set. I knocked out all the Hobl's pretty quickly. Dumb luck I guess. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
Hey Jay, when you mentioned knocking off all the Hobby variations, does that include the "no stats?" If so, I am very, very jealous! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
You have reason to very jealous then. The no stat was the very first Hobl I got. And just to add to the jealousy factor, back in 1982 I got open 50 packs of cigarettes that had 205s in them. Just wished they weren't owned by someone else, but it was still fun to open them. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ephuspitch
As usual, I'm chiming in from the completely novice side of the room. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I've been getting emails asking me what's different about this card - what's different is that an owner wrote 'Cin' on the back. Most obvious on the letter 'n'. I didn't include the e-bay link because I'm certain the current seller doesn't realize what's happened - he's selling a large lot he picked up. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
What's up with his lips. looks like they are off resigister, or else he is a vampire with a blood mustache. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
Jay...haven't you seen the ads? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I submited my first order to SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-27-2008 05:28 AM |
postal money order question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-15-2008 06:42 PM |
T205 backs - order of scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2007 08:50 PM |
Order Status mistake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-04-2006 01:22 PM |
1928 Ice Cream question--order of scarcity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-03-2005 11:33 PM |