![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Like it or not, there are legitimate size variations. I collect boxing T cards and I have several that are larger than the average. Most show excessive wear on a border, as though it had been sticking up over the edge of a stack. I also have seen quite a few obviously trimmed T cards that were probably cut down from oversized cards by some kid long ago. Unfortunately, when you get down to millimeters on items that were really throw-aways when they were made, you are going to find variations. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
e91-c, card size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-21-2006 06:22 PM |
M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 09:48 AM |
now you see it now it's smaller- scan size | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-16-2006 08:10 AM |
smaller card toploaders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2005 02:36 AM |
Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 08:40 PM |