![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After recount I do have 5 Elliotts including the damaged 5 version which I think may be the toughest.
May have to look for the Terwilliger logo. On of mine has a flattened area at top of logo rather that rounded. Are there some with gaps ? On Valo my version with the wavy front righ bottom border is missing the . in 280 Last edited by ALR-bishop; 01-22-2025 at 09:32 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had this one as a result of the lower right bar being somewhat cut off, like Minarcin, only less so.
One of these has the .280 BA without the dot on the reverse. Last edited by Sliphorn; 01-22-2025 at 11:41 AM. Reason: Adding pnoto |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know this is baseball cards, but this is variation in the 1956 Topps set. Both varieties are on COMC and eBay, so they are easy to get. You can see the yellow block on the lower right of the card front.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas--good to hear from you. My defective Valo is llike yours and is missing the dot before 280 on the back as well
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For 145 Valo, I did not know (thank you guys) about the front name box defect.
My version of .280 and 280 are both fully printed in the red name box. A smidgeon of the corner of the "2" in the "280" version is missing, if you look closely. Last edited by G1911; 01-22-2025 at 05:56 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1) Fully rounded, normal and proper logo 2) Flat top logo, top flattened and squished, but thinly connected. 3) Full gap, similar to 2 but the line is fully broken and cut off even more. The top black line is 'bent down'. Combined with the pirates logo and stocks, there are a lot of total versions of Terwilliger. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1952 Topps Bobby Shantz #219 comes with, beneath the bottom black border roughly below the first "B" in his first name:
1) Light pink blotch 2) Darker magenta/red spot 3) Cleanly printed |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those are good ones Greg. I think I posted mine in the Topps 1952 Gallery thread. There is a 59 Grammas card with a something similar blob, transition card and clean
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1964 Topps Giants #10 Jim Bunning comes with or without this white line running from his arm to the border, in the upper right of the picture. Neither version seems very difficult and there's plenty of examples of each on eBay, scanning over them.
This one also has a white line running from his hand to his cap, but not all with the dash have this. I think 3 total versions. Last edited by G1911; 01-31-2025 at 05:43 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope....I refuse to get involved with variants in that set
![]() ![]() But I really like the set Last edited by ALR-bishop; 02-01-2025 at 12:55 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1970 Topps #19 Johnny Boccabella comes with or without this small blue extension from the biography box, above the card number.
These are both the white stock reverses. Last edited by G1911; 02-16-2025 at 10:46 AM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If this one has been mentioned before I don't remember it. While searching 1957 5th Series cards for a different reason I ran across multiples of these so it is recurring and not a one time print freak.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cliff---I actually got one of these Lynch variants after Mike Cady posted one that I think he got from Thomas ( sliphorn) on his variations site. I also saw there and picked up another one with an incomplete back circle, Arroya 394, but unlike Lynch the side stats seem unaffected. Scans of both on site below
https://baseballcardvariationsguideb...58-topps-1962/ |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |