Quote:
Originally Posted by oldjudge
The cards were hand cut so a miscut here or there is not surprising. Your example illustrates two other things though. First, the card is obviously from 1890. When it comes to putting the correct issue date on the cards graders are either ignorant of the facts or lazy or a combination of both. Second, photo quality, the most important thing for Old Judge cards, is largely ignored in the grading process. It's not that your card has a bad photo for its' type, most 1890 cards have bad photos, but that fact should be reflected in the grade nonetheless.
|
Bad labeling on years is so rampant. Skipping the obvious ("1948" Leaf), there's a ton more...such as 1927 W560 which has a Rogers Hornsby - Chicago that could only be a 1929 at the earliest.
Fading is also something long ignored by TPG. I've seen some hardcore sun damaged and faded 60s cards go out to be slabbed and the graded ignoring the fading. The images weren't only weak, they had practically become another color in some areas because of the sun/display lighting damage.