![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks bad to me
As a owner of a PSA 1: This example looks 'baked' and the edeges i have seen, look too dark & dirty, most i seen are brownish color. The text block also looks suspicious, almost too pinkish This is only my observation at first glance, am far from being a expert.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie Last edited by pawpawdiv9; 10-07-2023 at 08:11 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948/49 Leaf Satchel Paige | samosa4u | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 03-29-2020 02:36 PM |
1948 Satchel Paige, real? | AstroJake09 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 07-24-2019 04:09 PM |
1948 Leaf Satchel Paige PSA 4 | Rhotchkiss | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 01-30-2018 07:42 PM |
Satchel Paige Single Signed Baseball Real Or Fake? | joed25 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 01-12-2013 06:48 PM |
'49 Leaf Satchel Paige, real or not? | dougscats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 10-04-2011 12:31 PM |