![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd say the stickers if anything are worth less than they were before. All of this is gimmickry - purple label, PWCC AA, E, whatever. As TPG grades supposedly consider only the physical condition of the cardboard and not necessarily eye appeal, stickers like this were originally just another stamp of approval that "Yes, this is a PSA 5, but it's a damn GOOD looking PSA 5." Ok, whatever. Given that the 5 itself is just someone's opinion and not an end-all, be-all pronouncement of value and card bragging rights hierarchy, how is a sticker any different?
To me these things are interesting, but unnecessary. Kind of like ebay re-authenticating cards already in PSA and SGC holders and then putting them in a neat little blue box to make them seem more official. It's largely a waste of time.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 09-20-2023 at 12:03 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
*ENDED* 1955 Clemente Rookie, PWCC "Superior (Top5 %)" Eye Appeal Certification | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-31-2021 05:56 AM |
*SOLD* FS 1955 Koufax Rookie, PWCC "Above Average" Eye Appeal | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-30-2021 09:29 AM |
CSA rating of 8 vs PSA rating of 8 Help?! | jeffmcurrie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-15-2014 03:49 PM |
T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |