|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Horizontal mathewson vs Cracker Jack which has more value | |||
| E98 mathewson |
|
3 | 3.09% |
| Horizontal mathewson |
|
13 | 13.40% |
| Cracker Jack mathewson |
|
76 | 78.35% |
| T205 cycle mathewson |
|
5 | 5.15% |
| Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is a huge difference between Matty's 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jacks (although I think both are more valuable than the other options).
Its not even a question that the 1914 CJ is a ton more valuable than any of the options. The 1914 CJ is a top 10+/- prewar card (as far being iconic) and an authentic sells for $30k+, with a 3+ easily selling for six figures. Thus, I assume you mean the 1915 CJ, which I think is more valuable than the other options |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson | Blunder19 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-15-2021 09:49 PM |
| WTB - D304 and/or Cracker Jack Mathewson | cguidi | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 02-13-2014 10:28 AM |
| 1915 Cracker Jack Mathewson PSA 7 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-21-2008 10:01 PM |
| 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-13-2003 09:43 AM |
| 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-23-2002 12:31 PM |