![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
As I noted, the process starts with the submitter first estimating the value, and submitting the item at the appropriate service level based on that estimated value formulated by the submitter. As I also noted, my experience is that PSA tends to be flexible/compassionate in their approach, rather than being aggressive to hit me with upcharges. I've read similar comments from others around here, so I'm inclined to believe that it's not just me. As I also outlined in my earlier example, only a very significant and dramatic increase in value above my estimated value would lead to a rise in TPG fees. So my conclusion is that the correlation between the grade and the TPG fees is weak. Yes, there is a correlation. But my conclusion is that it's not particularly strong. The exception, of course, is in situations where the item is right on the cusp of moving up to the next higher fee level, and a small increase in grade would move the item up to the higher fee level. I concede that's a possibility. Quote:
And my experience is that increases in grades in the scale of 2-3 grades above the original estimate are very rare. I suspect it's happened before, and could happen again, but I would argue that such a situation is very exceptional. But just because it happens in rare cases doesn't mean that we should let it keep us up at night. Quote:
Maybe to sum up a little - I think the other inherent flaws in the grading process deserve a lot more attention than this issue. I would argue that the potential for self dealing and special treatment of friends and family is a much bigger deal. Plus the very nature of the process being incredibly subjective that allows for a significant amount of grader discretion. I totally get that contingent fees gives you the willies, and cause you to question whether the grader can really be objective. That's cool too. I'm just not seeing that as the biggest issue in play here. A small issue, maybe. But given the enormity of the other issues in play, this one seems relatively minor to me. As you noted in your earlier post, this might be as much an issue as lacking independence in appearance. I certainly see the potential for that. But based on personal experience and most theoretical fact patterns, I'm just not seeing it play out as an actual bias to assign higher grades to generate higher fees. If anything, PSA's recent penchant for grading 1-2 grades low these days actually works against this argument.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 05-25-2023 at 08:38 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fanatics to acquire Topps. | Cmvorce | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 01-06-2022 04:24 PM |
Fanatics article on CNBC | rpz2 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-03-2021 01:31 PM |
Fanatics Authentic | redalpha7 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 04-28-2021 12:51 PM |
Steiner being bought out by Fanatics? | MikeKam | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 06-04-2019 04:15 AM |
Fanatics Authentic | carlsonjok | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-07-2015 07:24 AM |