![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the question really boils down to where do you draw the line between a 1.0 and a 1.5. Are they both 1.0, but one is a little less beat up than the other one?
Does it matter that they’re over 100 years old so they should be graded on a different scale than modern cards? I’m pretty sure the answer is yes. And maybe that’s the difference. I’m used to eagle-eyed posters around here being quick to point out all of the deficits on any given card that it’s easy to forget that for these cards, we can afford to be a little more forgiving.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Honus Wagner lot #1 in REA auction | rebelsart | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 04-04-2016 06:45 AM |
T206 Honus Wagner auction | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-04-2015 04:51 PM |
T206 Wagner in the next lelands auction | g_vezina_c55 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 12-16-2013 03:46 PM |
REA to auction T206 Wagner in April | brass_rat | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-11-2010 07:57 AM |
T206 Wagner auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-03-2007 11:32 AM |