![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't subscribe to, or care about the Registry, so don't really follow it or know much about how it truly works. But my understanding is that collector's collections/sets are ranked based on the average PSA grades of their cards. So how does that work for Registry ranking purposes when one person has a card graded PSA9(OC) versus another person with the same card graded a straight up PSA7 where there is no qualifier shown, but the downgrade from a 9 was due to the card also being slightly OC?
Does PSA somehow adjust for the qualifiers, so the Registry people see no difference, or does the PSA9 with a qualifier actually get more credit than a PSA7 with no qualifier in the Registry rankings? If they don't adjust for that, I can see a lot of Registry people getting pissed if they do away with qualifiers in the grading of cards going forward. Gives a potential unfair advantage to Registry people that had higher graded cards with qualifiers already included in their registry sets/collections. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Post Office - Beating a Dead Horse | obiwan1129 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-19-2021 10:52 AM |
Not to beat a dead horse, but is this Shoeless Joe too? | SethY | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-04-2010 08:22 AM |
Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse here, but | Howe’s Hunter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-13-2009 03:33 PM |
Beating a dead horse. PSA grading. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-22-2009 10:57 AM |
Are Old Judge Proofs a Dead Horse ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-16-2005 09:04 PM |