 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-07-2022, 06:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
So with PSA’s direction regarding the elimination of qualifiers, would an “old” holder that identifies a qualifier be more desirable simply because it has more information regarding what was identified during the grading process?
Regardless, I agree that this new direction continues to muddy the waters. And with respect to the Dr J cards you posted, I have no clue which one was graded 9 OC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Post Office - Beating a Dead Horse | obiwan1129 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-19-2021 10:52 AM |
| Not to beat a dead horse, but is this Shoeless Joe too? | SethY | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-04-2010 08:22 AM |
| Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse here, but | Howe’s Hunter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-13-2009 03:33 PM |
| Beating a dead horse. PSA grading. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-22-2009 10:57 AM |
| Are Old Judge Proofs a Dead Horse ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-16-2005 09:04 PM |
Threaded Mode