![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've seen some say versions of this: That players' card prices are proportional to the skill of the player, so if the numbers say player A (maybe Henry Aaron) was as good or better than player B (Mantle?), then if his cards aren't the same price, they are "undervalued."
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hobby history: The hobby 50 years ago, July 1967 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-23-2017 03:41 PM |
Hobby history: Card dealers of the 1960s: James T. Elder (+ hobby drama, 1968-69) | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-08-2017 05:23 PM |
Hobby Myths Most Accept as True | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-16-2010 03:08 PM |
OT - Mythbuster's is doing baseball myths right now. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-09-2007 07:43 PM |
urban card myths | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-25-2004 12:16 AM |