 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
03-14-2021, 10:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with you on most of the points you made, except for that the same card in a specific grade should be worth a certain price. The last thing we need is even more subjectivity in grading.
Grading companies are supposed to be able to spot an altered or fake card, and assign cards a numerical grade based on established and publish standards. They have had difficulty doing that so far. Some of us prefer to pay a premium for a centered 4 with nice color, registration, etc. Or a PSA 1 that looks like a 6 or 7 but has a small pin hole or back damage. Others may not. But this is not a flaw that needs to be corrected. It allows for different ways to enjoy the hobby.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A technical grading question... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-07-2018 12:50 PM |
| I appeal to your desire for eye appeal with 3 appealing cards | frankbmd | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 01-31-2017 09:00 PM |
| Growing appeal of...eye appeal? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-13-2015 12:36 AM |
| Eye Appeal -vs- Technical Grade | ls7plus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 05-16-2011 10:06 PM |
| Technical Difficulties - Sorry. | hugginsandscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2011 03:17 PM |
Threaded Mode