![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even though the art depicts Irving, the makers definitely intended this card to represent Cy, because of the Cleveland designation. I agree that the Boston portrait version is way more attractive and appealing (since that is actually Cy pictured), but the Cleveland version is definitely tough to come by, and it is a Young shown pitching for Cleveland. American Caramel snuck one past the kids back then, and adults today are still being fooled into forking out the dough for this one.
Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The price is based on the rarity of this card, irregardless of the player shown. Even if denoted as a common as Ted suggests, the card is very tough in any grade. In EX and above, almost non-existent.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 05-10-2020 at 02:41 PM. Reason: grammatically more grammatical now |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perceived or Real? Scarcity of 1959 Fleer Williams Card #68 | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 10-12-2007 06:56 AM |
Perceived or Real? rarity of 1967 B Robby, 1970 Bench | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 10-11-2007 08:23 AM |
1969 White-Letter Mantle Scarcity, Perceived or Real | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-03-2007 03:34 PM |
E90-1 Cards are Rare In Comparison to T-206 But... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-22-2007 01:15 PM |
A lesson in perceived market value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-16-2006 08:33 AM |