![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which would you prefer? | |||
PSA 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 40.54% |
PSA 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 59.46% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It very well could be short from the factory. There was variance in size right from the factory. Cards from vending were also sometimes cut slightly small. The probem is that unethical dealers have used this information to trim lots of cards and grading companies have slabbed them. I would rather have a card one grade lower that was proper size unless I knew the provenance of the other card.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1964 Topps Pete Rose SGC 70 | Nugen | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 09-05-2018 08:22 PM |
1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7 | Peter_Spaeth | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 04-30-2018 04:53 PM |
WTB 1964 Topps Pete Rose | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-16-2013 06:59 AM |
1964 Topps Pete Rose - $15 | sylbry | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-07-2013 02:21 PM |
FS 1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7 | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-28-2012 07:49 AM |