 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
01-18-2020, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lumpiness, trimming, an obvious seam when viewed from the side. Just for starters.
Creases that don't match up, if it's a bad one, there should be visible damage on both sides. Of course, the crease itself could be recent and there to hide a flaw created by the rebacking. The first check is if it's a possible combination. If it's not, that's usually it right there. (There are some recent discoveries of unknown cards that could be mistaken for rebacked, like a card that should be 150 only, but a P350 was found) Unfortunately rebacking isn't generally something the unskilled get into. So they might be harder to detect than other alterations. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peeling in 1963 Post Cereal Baseball Cards? | wolverinejayhawks | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 11-07-2015 02:52 PM |
| T206 front runs? | Luke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-17-2015 04:12 AM |
| WTB T206 Front Miscut... also a T206 Pattee Hindu Back | Blunder19 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-12-2011 10:16 PM |
| WTB T206 Front Miscut.. or T206 Ghost image | Blunder19 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 06-19-2011 12:00 PM |
| T206: What About Front Scarcity? | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-24-2010 10:30 AM |
Threaded Mode