 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
09-24-2019, 04:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
PSA will also not holder a card they think might get damaged in the process. And I would not expect any 3 as a maximum from PSA for tape stains. I'd more expect a 1 Poor.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 10:06 PM |
| Poll: Preferences to displaying your cards | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-29-2010 12:34 PM |
| OT/ I hate magic tape, and cards in contact with tape | FrankWakefield | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 10-02-2009 05:16 PM |
| Tape Stains and Soaking | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-11-2008 06:34 PM |
| Scotch Tape Stains | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-12-2005 10:55 AM |
Threaded Mode