![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jeffrey,
Just my 2¢ What I'm most intrigued by, and am curious about your opinion of, is Brent's assertions that "conservation" is perfectly acceptable in the hobby as he correlates it to the art world. This entire premise is ridiculous. Fine art works are inherently unique, 1 of 1 pieces. In that regard, condition and conservation of that condition are not as taboo. Graded Sportscards, by definition, are a world of comparison where the condition of one card can be exponentially greater than another simply based on condition. The "conservation" of that card then comes into question as it relates to the other cards in existence that have not been "conserved". I understand he is in self-preservation mode at the moment, but by uttering complete nonsense like he did with the above simply makes him look ridiculous and minimizes any other argument he puts forth in his defense. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1906 Lancaster Red Roses Post Card, 8 future T206 Major Leaguers | CMIZ5290 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-15-2019 05:12 PM |
Great Wash. Post piece re oldest living ex-MLB player | ValKehl | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-28-2014 11:29 PM |
This cartoon from today's Wash. Post ... | ValKehl | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-09-2014 07:28 AM |
Big NY Times piece today on card/autograph collector | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-08-2012 03:58 PM |
major fraud autograph update!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-28-2007 05:41 PM |