![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Giving the Wagner an AUTH wouldn't be rejecting it. And they could have set the tone for their new grading business that we will strive to get this thing right. Never has a business started off on worse footing than grading that card an 8. Shameful.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting T206 Heinie Wagner with missing team name | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-15-2016 12:48 PM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 07:22 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 03:32 AM |
T206 Honus Wagner PSA 9!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-22-2007 07:18 AM |