![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry guys but this is nonsense.
A peripheral device authenticating cards? Aside from the storing of the image for future comparisons, the only usable data that can be reliably extracted from a scan are measurements for total size and centering. Even that can easily be thrown off by a print defect or a slightly irregular cut. As far as alteration detection, the only way to use imaging technology to identify altered cards would be to have a massive database of card "before images" to compare to. Even if compiling a database with millions of entries was feasible, it could never be 100% accurate due to the amount of cards that come off the same print runs and have virtually identical physical qualities. There would be too many "perfect matches" to identify the true original. I know not everyone has a tech background so I understand the optimism when a discussion like this starts. At best, implementing technology can ASSIST us with card grading. It could never be done with perfect accuracy. There will always be errors: human and mechanical. The best we can do is use before and after pictures on currently graded or serial numbered cards. Anything beyond that would not improve upon the accuracy of a human physically measuring and inspecting a card. Has anybody calculated the current accuracy rate of the current grading process? I hear a myriad of complaints regarding the grades that were assessed wrong, but how many are done correctly? I would imagine it is something very north of 99%, no? Millions upon millions of graded cards out there and a few thousand are turning up bad? As far as ratios go, that sounds irrefutably reliable for a paid service. Yes, one could make the argument that the sample size is smaller because the focus seems to be on the higher value pieces, but that should not render the lesser value slabbed cards to be irrelevant here. There may never be a way produce a process that is void of error, collusion, or dubious behaviors. However, the current grading process as a whole IS accurate based on the numbers we are aware of.
__________________
EBAY STORE: ROOKIE-PARADE Last edited by lowpopper; 06-19-2019 at 07:59 PM. Reason: spelling |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 03-19-2009 09:44 AM |
little help on a grading company...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-12-2007 05:57 PM |
Exactly the kind of professionalism I want grading my pre-war cards! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-26-2006 07:47 PM |
new scd grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-10-2005 04:17 PM |
Is this grading company's name "asking for it" ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-03-2003 05:49 AM |