![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm thinking:
1: POOR+ : Poor, complete card but with nice eye appeal 0.5: POOR: Poor, complete card in bad shape Authentic: Card that is missing parts or has alterations Saying that, for the registry, Authentic is already given 0.5 points, so it pretty much rules out the above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA new grading system??? | V117collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-25-2012 05:02 PM |
SGC Grading System | MattyFan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-06-2011 07:39 PM |
Is the Grading System Broken? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 328 | 07-11-2007 10:09 PM |
One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
A new grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-15-2006 12:40 PM |