 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
10-26-2016, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Curious,
Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb View Post
For traditional cards, I would also go with the 1962 Topps. I understand the issue and PSA's position, the same goes for Tom Yawkey's rookie card appearing in the 1959 Fleer Ted Williams set. What is the issue? I don't understand PSA's position. Can you explain? Why wouldn't the '62 Topps Ruppert [or the '59 Fleer Williams] be the rookie card? What is the grading companies' rationale? Thanks Phil. Last edited by dougscats; 10-26-2016 at 02:57 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SOLD: (5) -Baseball Hall of Fame Rookie Cards (ALL SGC GRADED) | bcbgcbrcb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-12-2011 08:45 PM |
| Looking for people to write articles about certain cards. | mmync | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-27-2010 05:55 PM |
| Baseball cards and Addiction | BleedinBlue | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-10-2009 09:42 AM |
| strip cards 3 hall of famers plus 1 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-02-2007 09:01 AM |
| Betting on baseball cards article from CNN | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-16-2006 07:54 PM |
Threaded Mode