Brady Suspension Overturned

rats60 · #1 09-04-2015, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnaz01

I will say it AGAIN, what rule was he PROVEN to break?? This is the opportune word here: PROVEN in my opinion. The good thing is that here is the US, you are innocent until PROVEN guilty (lawyers chime in please

)

He was given his day in court and found guilty. You can choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore the overwhelming circumstantial evidence, but that doesn't change the fact that he was proven guilty.

Numerous quarterbacks have come out and said that there is no doubt in their minds that he was involved. Yesterday, it was Fran Tarkenton. QBs are the ones who dictate how the balls are prepared. I guess you think that Brady is unique and has nothing to do with how the Pats prepare their balls. If that was the case, then why did he lobby the NFL to change the rule allowing visiting teams to prepare their own balls?

gnaz01 · #2 09-04-2015, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60

He was given his day in court and found guilty. You can choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore the overwhelming circumstantial evidence, but that doesn't change the fact that he was proven guilty.

Numerous quarterbacks have come out and said that there is no doubt in their minds that he was involved. Yesterday, it was Fran Tarkenton. QBs are the ones who dictate how the balls are prepared. I guess you think that Brady is unique and has nothing to do with how the Pats prepare their balls. If that was the case, then why did he lobby the NFL to change the rule allowing visiting teams to prepare their own balls?

I'll say it again, he was never PROVEN guilty, it was stated he was guilty. HUGE difference!!

packs · #3 09-04-2015, 10:00 AM

Huge difference when you want there to be one. No difference at all when someone is sentenced to jail time for something they didn't do.

rats60 · #4 09-04-2015, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnaz01

I'll say it again, he was never PROVEN guilty, it was stated he was guilty. HUGE difference!!

That is your OPINION, not fact. HUGE difference.

egri · #5 09-04-2015, 10:12 AM

My kind of restaurant: http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/stor...-berman-090315

kcohen · #6 09-04-2015, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60

He was given his day in court and found guilty. You can choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore the overwhelming circumstantial evidence, but that doesn't change the fact that he was proven guilty.

Numerous quarterbacks have come out and said that there is no doubt in their minds that he was involved. Yesterday, it was Fran Tarkenton. QBs are the ones who dictate how the balls are prepared. I guess you think that Brady is unique and has nothing to do with how the Pats prepare their balls. If that was the case, then why did he lobby the NFL to change the rule allowing visiting teams to prepare their own balls?

In what court would that be where he was proven guilty? Unless you're speaking of the NFL kangaroo court, I have no idea what you're talking about. And that "court" offered no real proof. They believed him to be "generally aware" that something was going on. By that squishy criterion, you should be criminally liable when you are "generally aware" that illegal drugs are being sold on your the block.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Opinions on early Brady helmet?	DetroitCollector989	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	3	07-25-2015 09:30 AM
1862 CDV of Doubleday by Brady.	Brian Van Horn	19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T	2	02-09-2015 12:28 PM
Anyone have any tom Brady autos ????	soxfan1986	Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T	12	01-07-2014 05:24 PM
FS: Tom Brady Rookie Cards	greenmonster66	Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T	5	08-16-2013 02:48 PM
FS: Tom Brady Rookie Cards	greenmonster66	Football Cards Forum	1	03-22-2013 06:10 PM