FS 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Even with the spots it was THAT much better than any other one.

12/2/14 eBay Auction | Image prewarcardcollector d***f 25 $2,607.77
7/20/14 eBay Auction | Image probstein123 e***e 43 $2,042.42
6/4/14 eBay Image boyd_wilson5whl n***d 24 $1,755.00
5/14/14 Heritage Image 10 $1,673.00
3/16/14 eBay Image autographsink n***n 29 $1,815.00
12/4/13 eBay Image prewarcardcollector u***r 46 $1,826.00
11/3/13 eBay Image prewarcardcollector l***a 23 $1,363.00
5/28/13 eBay Image probstein123 d***i 26 $1,158.77

This is an upward trend in a year..looks like the card almost doubled in price. in a year...why cant it go up 30% more in 6 months......the other psa 5s not centered as well...i thought you buy the card not the grade?

also why even argue..proof is in the pudding.. ..it wasnt a buy it now..there were several bidders above $2000......even if the card not worth 2600..can be in the 2300 range in the next auction...no reason to be surprised if that happened...

[calvindog]

Sorry, I don't usually criticize grammar except when it's so painfully idiotic so as not to be believed. I honestly think that English is your second language. If not, perhaps you can explain to us why some sentences end with two periods, some end with none -- but no sentence ends with a single period.

And the "upward trend in a year" you mention is solely the work of two auction houses in which fraud is rampant: Probstein and PWCC -- based on their prior auction results which are suspect anyway. Regardless if the card is "centered amazing enough" (whatever that means -- I'll consult my ape/English translation program, however you previously described the centering as "decent[]."), it has an obvious print defect on the front. To suggest that this card is the wonderful specimen of all specimens to cause such a jump in price is laughable, even Mastro-like in its dishonesty.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Here is what the card looked like a few months ago when it sold, presumably to Jacob, for 1755. What a difference a scan makes.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Here is what the card looked like a few months ago when it sold, presumably to Jacob, for 1755. What a difference a scan makes.

i didnt buy the card for 1755...i 100% bought it off ebay...FYI....

[Peter_Spaeth]

OK fair enough my bad but my point was it sold in June for 900 less than it just sold for. Markets don't change that fast. SAME exact card.

[Sean1125]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

OK fair enough my bad but my point was it sold in June for 900 less than it just sold for. Markets don't change that fast. SAME exact card.

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

[Peter_Spaeth]

On a readily available non rookie non Mantle/Ruth card in midgrade?

[BlueBlood]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

Probably a flip that you low balled on..Since you are a "dealer"

Den.nis Sch.err

[Mikehealer]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

That statement should help you obtain you some new inventory.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by calvindog

Sorry, I don't usually criticize grammar except when it's so painfully idiotic so as not to be believed. I honestly think that English is your second language. If not, perhaps you can explain to us why some sentences end with two periods, some end with none -- but no sentence ends with a single period.

And the "upward trend in a year" you mention is solely the work of two auction houses in which fraud is rampant: Probstein and PWCC -- based on their prior auction results which are suspect anyway. Regardless if the card is "centered amazing enough" (whatever that means -- I'll consult my ape/English translation program, however you previously described the centering as "decent[]."), it has an obvious print defect on the front. To suggest that this card is the wonderful specimen of all specimens to cause such a jump in price is laughable, even Mastro-like in its dishonesty.

wow some may think you are personally attacking a poster on an issue of baseball cards...man real important to "look" real witty in a baseball card forum.

anyway..i think its just your opinion that the card isnt a great specimen for a psa 5.and not the final authority on the matter...we are talking general eye appeal.....but 3 others disagree that bid all time highs...i really dont see fraud happening when there is bidding with several bidders over an all time high...maybe to get the all time high, but once at the all time high you really got to be a conspiracy theory guy to think that they would play around with losing a deal when already above that limit

also you disagree with past sales because of the auction houses...well when the auction houses including ebay make up of the major part of the market share..i tend to cite those sales instead of some sales that make up very little of the market share..silly me...