![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
have the designation on the flip? Because they started adding more and more information to the T206 flip over time. If yours just says "T206", then that's one reason it's not there as a SGC 5. You may need to send it back to be reholdered to get it listed as a Hindu back on the Pop report.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 11-09-2014 at 02:38 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the SMR accurate? | Matthew H | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-01-2010 07:55 PM |
How accurate are population reports? | wolterse | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-14-2010 06:48 AM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 07:14 AM |
Accurate Vintage Stats: where to go? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-12-2003 04:20 PM |