![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No.
I just don’t understand what all the hubbub is about, with the exception of the very funny and witty commentary. I think the description is straight forward. Actually I think it shows the strength and intelligence of the house to present the card in the manner in which they have. Straight forward and carefully worded, qualified, explained. If you do not want to spend the money, then don’t bid. I would rather have a card that is - possibly a partial Honus Wagner card – than some academic variation, that is of little historical value - and may even consist of a dot on a common player card. But everyone is entitled to spend their money how they wish! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leon, I respectfully think you are off base on this one. Huggins and Scott is an auction house and their own integrity is on the line. Now it is clear to me that they have no qualms about BS-ing potential new hobbyists to make a few bucks. My trust in them just went out the window. The odds of their regaining my trust are about equal to the odds of that being a partial Wagner on that $5000 card.
JimB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It should also be noted that this card was recently purchased from T206 Museum.
http://t206museum.com/page/store_bkmiscut.html Josh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Crazy. Last edited by MVSNYC; 11-04-2013 at 11:19 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi John,
I understand very well the arguments relating to the percentage chance that the card contains a partial Wagner. I will say though – that in now a dozen posts in this one thread – you have restated in different words that the offering is “way off”. In your 13th post in this thread, why don’t you clearly state – why – you - feel it is “way off”. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is just stupid that they would do this. They have totally lost my respect.
The back of any Wagner has nothing to do with the value and it clearly does not show any of the front. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 11-05-2013 at 06:42 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Brock on the off chance you care or perhaps just don't know. Let us know I and others would be happy to explain why this is so off....way off. Cheers, John |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Walter Johnson Portrait /w Scarce Partial Factory 30 Number on Back PSA 3.5 | Sean1125 | T206 cards B/S/T | 12 | 08-23-2013 10:42 AM |
Honus Wagner T206 Piedmont Back | BlueDevil89 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 01-10-2013 02:59 PM |
t206 Wagner & 350 Piedmont Back | pirates60 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-11-2011 05:08 AM |
T206 Honus Wagner with Chesterfield back? :) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-24-2009 06:52 PM |
Is that freaking NASA T206 Wagner back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-17-2002 10:19 AM |