 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-22-2013, 03:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Why should one be surprised if you send the same card to the same company for grading, that it would likely receive the same grade?
I fully understand that a different grade (higher or lower) is a possibility as an element of subjectivity is involved, but that would not be my expectation. I would hope that the grading criteria are applied consistently enough so that the same grade would be a more common occurrence than a different grade. I do not think the equipment shown below is used by the reputable grading companies, but I'm sure some would differ with me. 
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 05-05-2016 at 08:55 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC grading question | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-19-2011 07:57 AM |
| Grading Question... | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-11-2011 01:56 PM |
| Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-04-2007 01:46 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| A grading question- SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-30-2006 03:23 PM |
Threaded Mode