![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know what Shelly edited out of his post, but it now reads accurately to me. The consignor pulled the lot due to "REA's efforts to provide additional information regarding provenance". Thus, "Rob had the guts to do what is right" (ask questions which led to the consignor pulling them). I know that this is what Shelly intended to convey with his post, and any feuds any of you have going with him isn't going to change his intent.
I don't know if the autographs are good or not, but the story behind them stinks, and the logic that some here used to defend them stinks as well. edited to add: (ask questions.......) text
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 04-29-2013 at 10:26 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I tried to send you a PM, but your box is full....
__________________
"What I have done after my baseball career -- being able to help people with their lives and getting their lives back on track so they become productive human beings again -- that means more to me than all the things I did in baseball" - Don Newcombe https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/jgmp123 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi James, I'm really sorry about that - I had to do it because of some cards I'm selling in the BST area. People keep sending me PM's and I can't handle them, so I let my inbox fill up, to force them to send emails.
You can reach me using 'contact member', but you have to choose email.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the only pressure for consignor to pull them in my theory is that rea would have pulled them and consignor thought better of it and pulled them first so they wouldnt have a history of being pulled by the auction house. now consignor can consign elsewhere with the jsa certs and no history of being rejected by an auction house, just voluntarily pulled.
but if that is the case then rea was ready to pull them if the consignor didnt do it themselves and if the consignor wasnt ready or able to answer additional questions on provenance, so i think that the deflecting answer of "consignor pulled items, not rea" is just semantics. what do others think on this theory. rea? what say you? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Both the consignor (and his buddy) and REA have posted here, so there is potential to hear both sides of the story. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It did not take the seller to make up his mind what he is going to do with the photo's.
I will attempt to either sell or auction them off again after I have them re-authenticated. That was quick. Last edited by shelly; 04-29-2013 at 12:08 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
i dont know why having them reauthenticated would do anything for this consignor. they have jsa, people blindly accept jsa. i dont know why but they do. the only other option is to have psa cert them? we have seen others that have opted to destroy a piece rather than it remain intact (see ty cobb laser index card), where it has been surmised by some that maybe the reason the cobb guy wanted to do that is so there isnt anything to look at in the future should anyone in any capacity want to study it. (he said it was because he didnt want anyone else to own it thinking it's real) not saying this consignor is thinking about doing that because evidently this consignor still believes it to be good? but we will see if it pops up at auction again. Last edited by travrosty; 04-29-2013 at 08:51 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I haven't even looked at them closely - I simply argued against the logic that one forum member used to defend them.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |