 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
03-04-2013, 06:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I hope that you survive your first T206 post and continue, because this is a great question.
In both cases the picture on the error card is the same as on the correct version, only the spelling or team is different. In both cases the printers made an error, caught the error, and corrected it by changing the caption beneath the picture. This change is enough to cause the new (correct) version to be considered a new card. If this definition of a new card seems arbitrary to you, I suppose that you're right. But this definition of what constitutes a new card has been accepted for years so I guess we just don't question it. Last edited by Sean; 12-01-2016 at 06:37 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sweet Cap (Fac. 30) set-No Wagner, Magie, Doyle & St Lo vars. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-10-2013 01:37 PM |
| Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 08-19-2008 03:03 PM |
| Survey: How many T206 Magie errors?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-29-2007 03:44 PM |
| "PIEDMONT 1st" Theory - Magie, Doyle Errors, etc. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-30-2006 08:48 AM |
| The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |
Threaded Mode