![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: should a seller refund a buyer even though there was a tracking number showing scans? | |||
Yes the seller should refund even though it's usps fault |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 64.65% |
no, the USPS made the mistake and not sellers fault. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 35.35% |
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
USPS being able to ask for proof of value AFTER they sold you insurance and lost your package seems strange to me. If they sell you insurance to me that infers that they are agreeing to protect whatever is in that package for that amount, since they are free to consider not insuring the package prior to sale.
Alternatively, what if you insured an item for less than it was worth? Will USPS pony up more money in that situation? Doubt it. Seems unethical to me all around. Last edited by packs; 09-04-2012 at 08:29 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
paying strong for the following 1952 topps baseball | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2008 10:08 AM |
Is it really Net54's fault? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-26-2007 10:23 AM |
Paying big money for the final 10 1911 Zeenuts I need.... | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 11-22-2006 05:45 PM |
paying stupid prices for common 33 Goudey PSA 7 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2006 04:40 PM |
It is not my fault | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-21-2005 04:46 AM |