 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
08-24-2011, 12:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In tracking my sales over the years I never felt that any quality vintage cards in SGC holders performed any worse than those graded by PSA, and in fact whenever I achieved a really crazy price in one of my auctions, more often than not it was an SGC card.
It's too simplistic to say PSA cards sell for more than SGC's. In the set registry area they generally do. PSA has that market. They also seem to have the bigger share of the postwar market. But when you're talking about a scarce or rare vintage card in mid-grade, say Good to Excellent, the SGC cards are usually more accurately graded and hold their own comparatively well. Both companies make grading mistakes but SGC makes fewer, and I think most collectors realize that. And that counts for something. Last edited by barrysloate; 08-24-2011 at 12:06 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Starting Today - T210s | alsup2311 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 3 | 08-22-2011 04:35 PM |
| FS: 1953 Topps Starter Set (20) - All SGC + bonus - SOLD | Irwin Fletcher | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-20-2010 08:55 PM |
| T206 for Sale: Almost 50% of set, 220 cards | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2010 04:42 PM |
| selling off my 1941 playball dupes all sgc | where the gold at? | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 03-13-2010 02:05 AM |
| SGC T205s (mostly 10s, 20s) for Sale | obcbobd | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 02-26-2010 08:18 AM |
Threaded Mode