 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-17-2006, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
condition of cards collected
Posted By: joe
1st of all I love the scans of all the cards posted on this site. I sometimes wonder if I set my sights to high on cards in better condition. I know when I started collecting over 30 years ago, I and most collectors strived for the highest and best condition on cards collected. Since I have found this site I see more and more cards with tears, pieces missing and creases, raw and graded. Some of these cards are rare, others are not. I applaud the collectors who collect lower graded cards I guess my question is, is it always price or the collector just wants the card no matter what condition and does not care about resale value? I don't want this post to offend anyone, I have cards in lower condition, example SGC 10 Houtemann Glendale, not vintage, but scarce, or Ty Cobb Sports Kings in SGC 30. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ralphie Parker collected T206's... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-27-2008 10:49 AM |
| Do you think vintage players collected their own cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-04-2005 09:38 PM |
| condition rarity in e cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-02-2005 11:24 PM |
| poor condition cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-17-2005 05:24 PM |
| Something to think about in regards to a cards condition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-06-2005 01:44 PM |
Threaded Mode