 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
09-21-2023, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Their eye appeal ratings were brilliant and ahead of their time. I realize that has always been an unpopular opinion and yeah I think they are a shady outfit to say the least. But the eye appeal ratings generated tremendous results at auction because the cards tended to have, well, great eye appeal.
I made this point a few years ago and a board regular freaked out about it. But I stand by it to this day. This does not excuse them from being involved in card doctoring, and many of the cards with strong eye appeal rankings surely were altered, but again, great concept. They could have built a great business on it but greed got in the way. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *ENDED* 1955 Clemente Rookie, PWCC "Superior (Top5 %)" Eye Appeal Certification | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-31-2021 05:56 AM |
| *SOLD* FS 1955 Koufax Rookie, PWCC "Above Average" Eye Appeal | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-30-2021 09:29 AM |
| CSA rating of 8 vs PSA rating of 8 Help?! | jeffmcurrie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-15-2014 03:49 PM |
| T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
| Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |
Threaded Mode