![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just wanted to get people's thoughts on the Memory Lane T205 set break that ended last night. I was pretty surprised that a lot of PSA 6 commons were going for well over 1K - in many cases, they went for more than Hall of Famers in PSA 5 (and we are not necessarily talking about short print commons or even marginal HOFers - think Jack Murray vs. Frank Chance, for example). T205 is obviously a very condition-sensitive set, but it increasingly seems like it is becoming grade above all in that set. Do people agree? Was this an aberration?
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars Last edited by jsfriedm; 09-10-2023 at 08:08 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Memory Lane Auction | parkplace33 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 08-27-2022 05:02 PM |
Memory Lane Auction | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-09-2011 07:42 AM |
Memory Lane Auction.... | illini805 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 08-10-2009 05:30 PM |
Memory Lane auction? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-28-2009 04:15 PM |
Memory Lane Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-17-2007 09:35 AM |