 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25
09-19-2022, 08:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
This is one of the big failings with numerical grading as it's done. For the upper grades, there's some degree of consistency. While there's differences between one card and another, most 8s will look similar. If they're different it's along the lines of "that's nicely centered, too bad about that one corner" Or "nice corners, too bad it's not centered all that well"
But at lower grades, there's lots more room for differences. On Quillen I was expecting better than a 3, but missed an erasure on the back. (Like never saw it in over 30 years missed it) Young was a pleasant surprise, I was expecting a 1, maybe a 2 because of the crease. even lower grade cards can be much farther apart. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | bigfish | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-18-2019 07:47 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks - Cuyler | markf31 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-24-2014 09:16 AM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 09:51 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks Bottomley (Green) and 1933 Tattoo Orbit Mack! | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-12-2008 01:29 PM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2007 06:59 PM |
Threaded Mode