 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19
09-16-2022, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting
Obviously there are major flaws in the other card..... your front is very clean which means collectors almost surely would value it more than the other one. I respectfully ask if it may be faded or washed out as it doesnt seem as "pink" as the other one? In any event it is a very nice example and the PSA grade would not hurt the value in my opinion as most collectors now look past the lower grade holders to see what the card actually looks like. Theres a bunch of crazy variations as to eye appeal of "1" graded cards. Very nice card in any event.... dont let PSA ruin your day!
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | bigfish | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-18-2019 07:47 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks - Cuyler | markf31 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-24-2014 09:16 AM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 09:51 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks Bottomley (Green) and 1933 Tattoo Orbit Mack! | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-12-2008 01:29 PM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2007 06:59 PM |
Threaded Mode